Management and behaviour Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Management and behaviour - Essay Example I should say that for as long as I can remember, I am not a team player. I prefer working on individual assignments. Working in a group project, therefore, as a requirement for this module was some sort of a struggle for me. This paper is a self-assessment of my team working skills based on how I evaluate my performance in our group project at British Airways. As much as possible, I exerted every possible effort not to compromise the objectivity of the assessment. However, since this is a group project, the assessment is still in relation to how I see myself as a part of the group. The first thing I noticed was that there was difficulty right at the start. It seemed very difficult not just for me but for the entire group to get going. I began to think then that I might be stalling the progress of the group. It was, therefore, a relief that I stumbled upon a book by Levi (2001) which revealed that â€Å"start up-activities take up longer than anticipated †¦ [because] it takes time to decide on the definition and goals of a project and to develop social relations and procedures for effective teamwork† (p. 40). It was also quite a revelation to discover from this reading that the most difficult stage of a group work is the definition of the project itself. For the first time, I was reading a book that I can relate to in real life. I felt an interest in being an active and productive member of a working group. The group was assigned tasks related to booking and reservation with British Airways. We were simply given a list of tasks to complete and we we re on our own. To make the long story short, almost every one in the group would like to take on technical tasks. The first group brainstorming session ended with no tangible results. The same thing happened to the second group session to thresh out problems in the first session. To

Europen Union Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Europen Union Law - Essay Example This is subject to the principles of equivalence and effectiveness, i.e. national procedural rules must not discriminate against EC law rights and must afford full effectiveness to EC law rights. Where national rules of procedure respect these principles, EC law normally does not require any particular regime of procedural or adjectival law to exist in the member states. In particular, EC law does not normally create any remedies in its own right, leaving the law on remedies to national law. In these fields of law, the doctrine of supremacy of Community law is well established. In case of conflict between Community law and national law, the member states courts are obliged to respect the Community law which to a large extent has direct effect in the member states and also in relations between private parties. Member states courts might sometimes hesitate to set aside national law provisions regarded as important because they are contrary to Community law and they normally know their own national law better than Community law. Thus, there are problems not only of obstruction but also of ignorance. There has been and still is an ongoing struggle to secure the full application of Community law in the member states. . ... If the national court decides to make a reference to ECJ, proceedings are stayed in the national court until the ECJ gives its ruling. The Court has also assessed the legality of derogations to Community rules by reference to fundamental rights. In particular, the Court has applied article 10 of ECHR to a case in which a Member State justified a measure having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions based on the need to secure protection of fundamental rights, such as media plurality2. The key factors that have helped in developing the Community legal system, are that the obligation in Community law to duly motivate any decision3, the principle of transparency to which Community and domestic Administrations have to comply with, individuals' right to have their legal positions fully and effectively protected4 and the principle of the liability of a Member State for breach of Community law5. The judgments of the Court, in this aspect, have played a fundamental role in trying to build an even playing field to secure a minimum standard of substantive judicial protection of Community rights. The Court has asserted a founding principle of the EC legal system that national judicial remedies must be adequate, and any impediment to Community rights being enforced effectively should be removed in the name of the supremacy of Community law6. In 1976, the Court had insisted that an essential element of the Community's constitutional order was the freedom of Member States to implement their Community obligations according to their individual traditions of public law and civil and criminal justice7. The only conditions set down by the Court of Justice were equal treatment and effectiveness. National courts and administrations were prohibited from making it more